Bodhi: an experiment to decide the problem of stimulating video and financing public goods
The content industry has never been porn (https://k2sxxx.com/) the main industry. Most of the guys are the creators of the content? Only four.
This is strange.
We, people, are spiritual beings. You don’t just need to live in the physical world, we also exist in the mental worlds that we have developed a rammer for a friend: stories, music, cinema and championships. In addition to these creations, we are going through difficult times. This can be associated with the fact that there are some important difficulties, which should be solved with the two most key ones: popularity and activation. Web2, such as facebook and tiktok, decided very well, it could be with the help of social networks or ai, which they continue to improve their own schemes. Problem. And such a moment for the purpose of the bodhi was created. (Views and likes) or financial benefit (work).
People came up with many methods to make money on their own content, for example, adding sponsorship and selling products inside it.
These approaches create the latest barrier, since this requires that the creators of the content are not stupid by creators, but also by businessmen. Are they good enough? If people are not able to make money even from entertainment, this suggests that our current approach is fundamentally errone.
Why so low? Due to the fact that advertisers did not want to broadcast advertising on porn sites. This is the simplest of the problems of advertising - advertisers choose content - and the audience. The meaning for those does not often mean the value for advertisers.
Then, with precisely on the basis of the subscription, the income of the creators was significantly multiplied.
However, in no case is the best choice. Understanding restrictions only fans is the key to solving the problem of stimulating content.
The problem, with only fans: it reduces the value that creates material for the world.
- On pornhub, your content is able to use 100,000 visitor, which guarantees a significant cost, but brings you minimal profitability. But the catch is reduced by such a common “cake” - only 100 people see your content, reducing the value, then it adds to the abyss.
The final decision. The ideal approach must be an increase in the cake and capture a fair share.
Copying with data, not costs of costs, but our economic computer does not function for products with zero limits. An apple for the only dollar, i lose an apple, but get a dollar, after which you spend the dollar, but get an apple. This is that each economic os was developed for the exchange of a product. Information can be reproduced endlessly. On such exchanges, the final valuable resource (money) is traded on what happens endlessly to duplicate without any price. The task of the remuneration of the directors, and the dilemma of the “contracting cake”, mentioned earlier. A trading model that is different from use ”in their main position without bothering to stimulate.
Let us return to the case that we strive to solve: stimulating valuable content. Two calculations:
1. How to distinguish the value of content 2. How to provide incentives
How to distinguish the content of content
One thing is defined: we cannot measure the value of content by content itself. The value of content is determined by its consumers.
The same article seems meaningless for one reader, but is able to be an inspiration for a million green for another; as a porno can be trivial for a specific viewer, but it is important for another.
It looks like yandex and google. The value of the profiles is not about the same, as often keywords arise, but how many other pages resort to the structure. It K2sxxx should not be borne in mind that this is content. It measures the value through consumer behavior.
How to give incentives
First, let's look at who will not be a good solution in harmony with a crypto -protocol:
Any paywall (pay to see) is not amenable.
For what reason? Does this work when you do not use it in which you need to contain the corresponding content? This is similar to invest to us whose products can disappear from the ground at all times that it makes no sense.
Instead, the content should be observed in a place that is constantly available, i.E. E. On the blockchain. Blocks, such as arweave, created for storage, can realize this business. Paywall for a public thing, you want to encrypt it. But where is the decoding process? If it is controlled by a centralized server, its failure means that content becomes invalid, the same from direct hosting on a centralized server.If the resource is deciphered through blockchain mechanisms, this program remains public.
So, “paywall” is not only ineffective economically, but technically impossible.
The path when we explore content, on the blockchain, we find that the player has two characteristics: everyone can get access to a person not operating), and your entrance does not affect the access of others not rivalry ).
This is exactly the definition of public goods. That is why the problem of stimulating content is so complicated, because it is mainly the problem of financing public benefits, a dilemma, where humanity fought during within for within for within within for during for within the course for within for within within for during for within for within for within the course for during for during for during for during for during millennia.
Bodhi is an experiment on the verdict of the problem of stimulating content.
In return for trusting advertising or a planned wall, bodhi turns what the geembler create into an asset, for example, a mini-component.
Adults are able to buy and sell their shares directly with bodhi. Promotional prices are automatically increasing when citizens buy, and decrease when they sell them. In addition, whenever someone sells shares of your content, you take part of the transaction in the role of a board. An object. During the purchase of users, the token is more clear, and its price follows a quadratic curve using the volume of supplies. Since the protocol acts as a trading contract, liquidity is preserved, even in that situation, if there is only a single buyer for an asset. I had an idea for more than one year, but mine to be confident here arose due to a sudden awareness:
For the most most of the most voluntary the most spanned the most spent the most popular difficult problems, the answers may not lie in essences , and in the void (in the proposed souls). This is the greatness of bitcoin, which is not so easy to recognize. However, the pussies in the arsenal have one common feature: they exist only in our souls and have every chance of making very strong stimuli for everyone. My intuition tells me that the meme and ponzi are underestimated and able to keep the key to the issue of financing public goods.